Categories
Uncategorized

This shelf range caught my eye as I was waiting for the compact shelving to open, and one of the titles looked a bit out of place. But it wasn’t!

Sex in public : the incarnation of early Soviet ideology / Eric Naiman. (OCLC #35450552)

Though other title information is not technically a core element in RDA (only title proper is), there are times when it gives needed context! Other title information is core for LC and NLA.

Not that we depend solely on the title for discovery; the record also has two good subject headings:

651 _0 ǂa Soviet Union ǂx History ǂy 1917-1936.
650 _0 ǂa Communism and sex ǂz Soviet Union.

and has been classed with other books about the first one (DK266 = History, Soviet Regime), though depending on the actual content of the book, it could also reasonably go under HX550.S49 (Communism and sex).

Categories
Uncategorized

Differential and difference equations with applications : contributions from the International Conference on Differential & Difference Equations and Applications / Sandra Pinelas, Michel Chipot, Zuzana Dosla, editors. (OCLC #829754700)

The title page says that the three people listed are “editors”, so which relator term to use? “editor”? “editor of compilation”?

This title is a conference proceedings (a Festschrift, even!), so consists mainly of papers, individual works with their own creators. The editors wrote the brief preface, and likely did some editing/formatting of the collected works, so they fit the definition of “editor of compilation”.

Categories
Uncategorized

RDA Tip of the Week: Editor? Compiler? Editor of Compilation?

RDA has three relationship designators that sound remarkably similar: editor, editor of compilation, and compiler. If the title page says “editor” or “compiler”, which relator term should you use? Which MARC tag?

A compiler is a creator of a new work. Specifically, it is “a person, family, or corporate body responsible for creating a new work (e.g., a bibliography, a directory) by selecting, arranging, aggregating, and editing data, information, etc.” Data-heavy works such as bibliographies and technical handbooks are likely to have compilers. This access point goes in a 1XX (if there is more than one creator, others will go in a 7XX).

An editor is a contributor to an expression of a work. Specifically, it is “a person, family, or corporate body contributing to an expression of a work by revising or clarifying the content, e.g., adding an introduction, notes, or other critical matter. An editor may also prepare an expression of a work for production, publication, or distribution.” A work by a previous creator that has been edited for this expression is likely to have an editor, in addition to its original creator. This access point goes in a 7XX.

An editor of compilation is a contributor to an expression of a (collective) work. Specifically, it is “a person, family, or corporate body contributing to an expression of a collective or aggregate work by selecting and putting together works, or parts of works, by one or more creators. The editor of compilation may also be involved in clarifying the content, e.g., adding an introduction, notes, or other critical matter, of the compilation.” A collection of works by individual authors, such as a conference proceedings, is likely to have an editor of compilation. This access point goes in a 7XX.

UPDATE: the April 2014 update to RDA will remove “editor of compilation” as a relationship designator; this relationship will be grouped with “editor”.

Categories
Uncategorized

The Charleston-Nebo allochthon : missing link of the Sevier belt. (OCLC #874157910)

While cataloging these geology field trip reports, I’ve been wanting to add an access points for the field trip leaders, but wasn’t sure if they were technically contributors to the book in hand – does that matter?

I must have contributor in my head from Dublin Core. The list of relationship designators at RDA I.2.2 is “Relationship Designators for Other Persons, Families, or Corporate Bodies Associated with a Work”, which they definitely qualify as. In fact, the term organizer fits them perfectly:

A person, family, or corporate body organizing the exhibit, event, conference, etc., which gave rise to a work.

So, Kurt and Ned get to have access points in the record:

700 1_ Constenius, Kurt N. ǂq (Kurt Norman), ǂe organizer.
700 1_ Sterne, Ned, ǂe organizer.
Categories
Uncategorized

The Louisville Water Company project / University of Kentucky College of Design. (OCLC #874556403)

RDA Appendix A.4 describes how to capitalize the title of a manifestation, and includes the instruction to follow Appendix A.10-A.55 as well. For example, A.13 is for capitalization of place names; A.16 is for capitalization of corporate bodies.

But what is this title referring to? A water company project in Louisville? A project surrounding the Louisville Water Company? A named project, called Louisville Water Company Project?

I skimmed the text and found lots of references to the Louisville Water Company (LWC) capitalized as such, but not the Louisville Water Company Project, so I decided to capitalize only the corporate body LWC.

An argument could be made to capitalize Project as well; projects are corporate bodies under RDA, and the book’s text does reference The River Cities Project, which this is part of. Projects are corporate bodies under RDA, so we could follow the rules there and capitalize as The Louisville Water Company Project.

Fortunately, indexing will rarely be affected either way, so it’s mainly a style choice.

Categories
Uncategorized

RDA Tip of the Week: Relator terms for Meetings

Most relator terms in an RDA MARC record will appear in a ǂe of the access point field. For example:

100 1_ ǂa Snicket, Lemony, ǂe author.
700 1_ ǂa Klassen, Jon, ǂe illustrator.
710 2_ ǂa IBM de Chile, ǂe sponsoring body.

The added entry field for Meeting names, 711, uses ǂe for a different element (“subordinate unit”), so in that field, the relator term goes in a ǂj. For example, if you want to add an access point for a conference as a sponsoring body, it is encoded like:

711 2_ ǂa AAPG Convention ǂd (1992 : ǂc Calgary, Alberta),
         ǂj sponsoring body.

Similarly, subfield ǂj is also used for the relator term in 111, 611 and 811.

Categories
Uncategorized

Geology of the foothills and front ranges west of Calgary, Alberta : guidebook / compilers and leaders, Thomas E. Kubli and Robert J. Leibel. (OCLC #874154841)

Cataloging these geology field trip guidebooks, I have been adding access points for the meeting in a 711, but feeling weird about not linking them with relators. Are there even relator terms whose descriptions refer to meetings of conferences? Also, ǂe of 711 has a different meaning (“subordinate unit”), so where would the relator go?

RDA Chapter 11 says that conferences (also events like festivals) are considered corporate bodies, and that chapter includes instructions for recording the number of a conference, so relators that are used for corporate bodies can be used for conferences when that makes sense.

The OCLC Bib Formats page for 711 says that there is a subfield for relators: ǂj. (Apparently this subfield has been around since OCLC Tech Bulletin 255 in 2008 – who knew?)

For this record, I added the access point, complete with the relator term:

711 2_ ǂa AAPG Convention ǂd (1992 : ǂc Calgary, Alberta),
              ǂj sponsoring body.
Categories
Uncategorized

Hyperbolic conservation laws and related analysis with applications : Edinburgh, September 2011 / Gui-Qiang G. Chen, Helge Holden, Kenneth H. Karlsen, editors. (OCLC #847125824)

The tables are turning; I have often had to upgrade a skimpy ebook record using the print description, but for this one I did the opposite. OCLC had a robust and popular ebook record, but the only print record is a skimpy Level 3 with only a few holdings.

It was nice to have a record to derive from, though it was in some ways incomplete. I still had to assign a call number (ebook records don’t always include them) and check for features are are not always evident from the ebook edition, such as bibliographical references and index.

Categories
Uncategorized

Fundamentals of matrix-analytic methods / Qi-Ming He. (OCLC #829754638)

The preface of this book was incredibly helpful in assigning the call number. The copy in OCLC already had a subject assigned (“Matrix analytic methods”) but needed a full call number. I did a correlations search in Classification Web which gave the class number QA274.2, which corresponds to “Stochastic analysis”, a broader term of “Matrix analytic methods”. So is that the right class number?

The preface of the book has a nice section called “Topics and organization of the book” which lists the broad topics of each chapter, including Poisson processes, Markov chains, and Queuing theory, all of which are narrower terms of “Stochastic processes” (a broader term “Stochastic analysis” even). I went with the broader class number, QA274, and added a few more subject headings for the other topics covered in depth.

QA274.2 may not seem far from QA274, but in my library, there would be about 100 books between them!

Categories
Uncategorized

The role of energy in Iran-Turkey relations / Omid Shokri Kalehsar. (OCLC #873602124)

After reviewing the differences between the free-floating subdivisions –Relations, –Foreign relations, and –Military relations, I assigned this heading:

Iran ǂx Foreign relations ǂz Turkey.

When one of these relations subdivisions is further subdivided geographically, you need an additional heading with the geographic terms reversed (SHM, H 1629) so I assigned this one as well:

Turkey ǂx Foreign relations ǂz Iran.